Plants

Add a sighting Subscribe View significant View unidentified

Plants

Daisies

Lilies & Irises

Peas

Other Wildflowers & Herbs

Orchids

Wattles

Gum Trees

Other Trees

Other Shrubs

Climbers & Mistletoes

Ferns and Clubmosses

Grasses

Rushes, Sedges & Mat Rushes

Other Fresh Water Plants

Cacti & Succulents

Marine Water Plants

Moderators

MichaelMulvaney

Tapirlord

natureguy

plants

RWPurdie

PatrickCampbell

JasonPStewartNMsnc2016

Boobook38

Steve818

ESP

Daisy

Ange

RoseWood

AliciaKaylock

shrikestar8

become a moderator

Announcements

NatureMapr now receives more records in NSW than ACT

7 Mar 2025

Since 1 Jan 2025, NatureMapr 44% of all sightings uploaded were NSW based, while 43% were from the ACT.The remaining 13% were from other states, with VIC coming in third at 5%.Strictly speaking, 67% o...

NatureMapr Data Collector 6.2.1 update

Critical nature positive infrastructure update

IMPORTANT NatureMapr Data Collector 6.2.0 mobile app update

Known issue affecting user registration via naturemapr mobile app

Discussion

Tapirlord wrote:

4 hrs ago

In this case the morphology of the inflorescence isn't diagnostic between these two with both species exhibiting variation between head-like and diffuse-pseudolateral. Generally, pith is used to separate these two (it's very fine in J.filicaulis) but in absence of this i used the following features:

-Tepals apparently stramineous with no obvious longitudional banding
- Clusters being on the smaller side
- Previous Juncus subsecundus record at site
- Juncus subsecundus being the more common species

Juncus subsecundus

Mike wrote:

4 hrs ago

Thanks to the Fire Management Unit the large plant has been removed. Now there are just a few sq.m. of suckers and seedlings to treat.

Passiflora caerulea

mcosgrove wrote:

4 hrs ago

The smaller plant without the pink daisy flowers

Poranthera microphylla

lbradley wrote:

7 hrs ago

Hi Ciaran - what do you need for a species? Cheers, Lisa

Euchiton sp.

AndyRoo wrote:

8 hrs ago

Hi Ciaran, thanks for all the recent IDs of my latest lot of sightings. In this case I'm having trouble seeing how the morphology of the flowers/fruit fits with the many other J. subsecundus sightings on CNM that I've looked at? I initially suggested J. filicaulis mainly because of the distinct dense clusters of fruit/flowers. If you can fit it in I'd appreciate anything you can do to further enlighten me, thanks?

Juncus subsecundus