I’ll accept stricta, that was my first choice, but the leaves are very different from the type specimens and a bit closer to purpurea, so I went with that. Sometimes I think that given the high degree of variation in leaf shape and flower colour that stricta and purpurea are phenotypes rather than species.
What shape were the stems? It is hard to tell from the photos. They are triangular and slightly ribbed in stricta; or terete (round) and ribbed in purpurea. A lot of Plantnet descriptions are unchanged since Flora of NSW was first published in the 1990s. These descriptions suffer from extremely restrictive limits on word count. Where they are available, I prefer to use Vicflora to fill the descriptions out. Vicflora states that the back of the corolla in purpurea is covered in grey to black hairs, while that of stricta has shaggy rusty hairs.
I agree that PlantNet is increasingly out-dated and unreliable. It has been consistently underfunded by successive governments and is now a sad relict of what it could and should be. VicFlora is far superior as a website; much easier to search; far more information provided; more current; more accurate. When working on the Snowy 2.0 EIA, we used VicFlora far more often than PlantNet for those reasons. PlantNet is now a sad embarrassment. For NSW-endemics or at least species not present in VIC, we no longer have a reliable on-line resource for identification and distribution data. There aren't the staff available to fix it. There's no money to replace the web platform (which is archaic and clunky). If you think this is inadequate, write to the Minister for Environment, emphasising that VicFlora is much better (and why). Interstate rivalry might be an effective motivator for action when science isn't (or hasn't been so far). I've tried to have this addressed, along with the lack of funds or a funding mechanism for the description of new species, but haven't had any luck so far. I hear that the current Minister is more progressive than most of his predecessors, so there might be new hope... In the meantime, go with VicFlora where possible.
On the other hand, there are many new descriptions being added to Plantnet, the staff are doing a wonderful job with the resources they have, and are extremely helpful to enquirers. Flora of NSW, and therefore Plantnet, has a lot of the information missing from the plant descriptions which is tucked away in the keys.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
2,203,459 sightings of 20,917 species in 9,213 locations from 12,749 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.